Measuring impacts in the wild: lessons from a marathon race

This abstract has open access
Abstract Summary
Most running studies are conducted in laboratories and lack ecologic validity. Purpose 1. compare landing impacts between footstrike patterns (FSPs) during a marathon and 2. assess the relationship between speed and landing impacts across FSPs. Methods: Tibial shock of 226 M+F individuals (44.3±11.1yrs) was collected during a marathon. Habitual FSPs were screened prior to the race (169 RFS, 32 MFS, 23 FFS). Peak tibial shock (TS) was calculated at the 10km point of the marathon. TS was correlated to speed across FSPs. Results: Peak TS(g) was highest and similar in RFS and MFS, and lowest in FFS. TS was positively correlated to speed for RFS and MFS groups (p< 0.02), but not for the FFS group (p=0.83). Conclusions: RFS and MFS runners exhibit similar impact loading that is higher than FFS runners.
Submission ID :
UCB390
Select an Abstract Type
Select a Topic

Abstracts With Same Type

Submission ID
Submission Title
Submission Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
UCB515
Imaging
Symposium presentation
Amy Lenz Amy Lenz
UCB415
Reflections from Past Career Awardees of the Canadian Society for Biomechanics (CSB/SCB)
Symposium presentation
Cheryl Hubley-Kozey Cheryl Hubley-Kozey
UCB501
Rehabilitation: Bio-robotics and exoskeletons
Symposium presentation
Elizabeth Russell Esposito Elizabeth Russell Esposito
UCB458
Modeling: Musculoskeletal
Symposium presentation
Benedikt Sagl Benedikt Sagl
UCB477
Rehabilitation: Prosthetics and orthotics
Symposium presentation
Richie Gill Richie Gill
UCB359
Upper extremity
Symposium presentation
Francisco Valero-Cuevas Francisco Valero-Cuevas
UCB529
Locomotion: General
Symposium presentation
Jesse Dean Jesse Dean
UCB516
Modeling: General and simulation
Symposium presentation
Amy Wu Amy Wu
UCB358
Orthopaedic: Bone
Symposium presentation
Junghwa Hong Junghwa Hong
1083 visits