Abstract Summary
There are several methods for computing average vertical loading rate (AVLR) in the literature. In this analysis we developed a novel method (the 3-12% auto method) and compared it to 2 methods of computation previously established in the literature (the 3-12% method and 20-80% method). The 3 methods demonstrated good inter-method agreement [ICC (2, 5) .848]. Moderate to strong correlations were found (r (60) =.503-.960, p< .05) indicating significant linear relationships between the 3 methods, with the strongest relationship between the 3-12% auto and 20-80% methods. The results suggest that the 3-12% auto method may serve as a suitable, reliable alternative to compute AVLR regardless of impact peak presence / occurrence.