Abstract Summary
The rate of oxygen uptake (V̇O2) has been used to infer changes in metabolic rate with changes in EMG; however, V̇O2 is simply a proxy for the energy cost (EC) of exercise since the former does not account for substrate use. We compared the EMG/V̇O2 to the EMG/EC across different power outputs and shoe conditions and found both increased as a function of power output, suggesting a higher metabolic cost for a given level of activation, regardless shoe condition or whether V̇O2 or EC is used to quantify metabolic rate.